Sunday, December 11, 2011

Stealth and Threat Aviodance


Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird


The SR-71 was the first operational aircraft designed around a stealthy shape and materials. There were a number of features in the SR-71 that were designed to reduce its radar signature. The first studies in radar stealth technology seemed to indicate that a shape with flattened, tapering sides would avoid reflecting most radar energy toward the radar beams' place of origin. To this end, the radar engineers suggested adding Chines to the design and canting the vertical control surfaces inward. The aircraft also used special radar-absorbing materials which were incorporated into saw tooth shaped sections of the skin of the aircraft, as well as cesium-based fuel additives to reduce the exhaust plumes' visibility on radar. Despite these efforts, the SR-71 was still easily detected on radar while traveling at speed due to its large exhaust stream and air heated by the body (large thermal gradients in the atmosphere are detectable with radar). The SR-71's radar cross section (RCS) of almost 10 square meters was much greater than the later F-117's RCS, which is similar to that of a small ball bearing.
The overall effectiveness of these designs is still debated; Ben Rich's team could show that the radar return was, in fact, reduced, but Kelly Johnson later conceded that Russian radar technology was advancing faster than the "anti-radar" technology Lockheed was using to counter it. The SR-71 made its debut years before Pyotr Ya. Ufimtsev's ground-breaking research made possible today's stealth technologies, and, despite Lockheed's best efforts, the SR-71 was still easy to track by radar and had a huge infrared signature when cruising at Mach 3.2 or more. It was visible on radar since air traffic control tracked it when not using its transponder, and missiles were often fired at the aircraft.

Although equipped with defensive electronic countermeasures, the SR-71's greatest protection was its high top speed, which made it almost invulnerable to the attack technologies of the time. Over the course of its service life, no SR-71 was shot down, despite many attempts to do so. It flew too fast and too high for surface-to-air missile systems to track and shoot down, and was much faster than the Soviet Union's fastest aircraft of the time, the MiG-25, which had a top speed of Mach 3.2 at high altitude, however the engines would burn up at that speed. All the SR-71 pilot had to do was to accelerate.
Chines Head-on view of an A-12 (precursor to the SR-71) on the deck of the Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum, illustrating the chines.

One of the Blackbird's interesting features was its chines, sharp edges leading aft on either side of the nose and along the sides of the fuselage.

The Blackbird was originally not going to have chines. At its A-3 design stage, the fuselage had a circular or vertical oval cross section. Dr. Frank Rodgers, of the Scientific Engineering Institute (a CIA front company), had discovered that a section of a sphere—round on the bottom and flat on top—had a greatly reduced radar reflection. He adapted this to a cylindrical fuselage by 'stretching' the sides out and leaving the bottom round. After the advisory panel provisionally selected Convair's FISH design over the A-3 on the basis of RCS, Lockheed adopted chines for its A-4 through A-6 designs, and used them in redesigning the A-11 into the A-12.
The aerodynamicists discovered that the chines generated powerful vortices around themselves, generating much additional lift near the front of the aircraft, leading to surprising improvements in aerodynamic performance. The angle of incidence of the delta wings could then be reduced, allowing for greater stability and less high-speed drag, and more weight (fuel) could be carried, allowing for greater range. Landing speeds were also reduced, since the chines' vortices created turbulent flow over the wings at high angles of attack, making it harder for the wings to stall. The Blackbird can, consequently, make high-alpha turns to the point where the Blackbird's unique engine air inlets stop ingesting enough air, which can cause the engines to flame out. Blackbird pilots were thus warned not to pull more than 3 g, so that angles of attack stay low enough for the engines to get enough air. The chines act like the leading edge extensions that increase the agility of modern fighters such as the F-5, F-16, F/A-18, MiG-29 and Su-27. The addition of chines also allowed designers to drop the planned canard foreplanes. Early design models of what became the Blackbird featured canards.
When the Blackbird was being designed, no other airplane had featured chines, so Lockheed's engineers had to solve problems related to the differences in stability and balance caused by these unusual surfaces. Their solutions have since been extensively used. Chines remain an important design feature of many of the newest stealth UAVs, such as the Dark Star, Bird of Prey, X-45 and X-47, since they allow for tail-less stability as well as for stealth.

ATCS Project

Automatic Traffic Control System
(ATCS)

This was my project in my 2nd year of my university, a project based on traffic system in karachi. A program made on C Programming language.
Problem: There are some timings in which the flow of traffic of side is increased while the other is decreased, in morning the flow of traffic increases from Shahra-e-faisal to I.I.C Road, while in evening, the flow from I.I.C Road to Shahra-e-faisal increases, while the signals timings are same, which causes traffic jam. The traffic constables risks their life, by turning off the traffic signaling system, and managing the traffic by hands.
Solution: The solution is provided that a program should be made, in which the traffic signals is being controlled by a single police constable sitting at the office, and setting the time for each signal to be open.

Aim: To design an AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM (ATCS), with time settings, graphical mode viewing of signals and interfacing it with hardware.

Me programming... ;)
Testing the system using LCD's
 Graphical Viewing of ATCS


Conclusion:
Through this program, it will be easier to control the flow of traffic, this means one don’t need to control traffic through hands by closing the signal system, just enter the time for each signal, and it will work automatically. This program will work great on heavy traffic loads in specific times. This program is password protected, it means, no one can enter this program, until it enters the password.


MIL-STD-1553 Video Explanation

There are four videos explaining about Military Standard 1553, Architecture, working and importance.

Part 1: http://adf.ly/49tzL

Part 2: http://adf.ly/49u5w

Part 3: http://adf.ly/49u6q

Part 4: http://adf.ly/49u7J

Saturday, December 10, 2011

MIL-STD-1553

ABSTRACT:

MIL-STD-1553 Bus Architecture system is vast field for research and development. This simple system shows the ability to apply complex mechanical structure into simple fly by wire system. MIL-STD-1553, which is digital multiplex data bus that works on internal time division command and response mode, is a military standard that describes the method of communication and the electrical interface requirements for subsystems connected to the data bus. This architecture was developed for making light weight jet fighters by removing mechanical structure. The serial communication bus is used to achieve the aircraft avionics, i.e., MIL-STD-1553B, where B shows the revision. In the future, it will be used to extend the system integration to flight controls, propulsion controls, and vehicle management system (electrical, hydraulic, environmental control, etc.).
This system has many applications in the field of avionics, where weight is considered mostly. With the advancements of aircrafts, a newer, lighter, faster, and higher performance is needed. Hence, the old mechanical systems started inaccurate.


More information about MIL-STD-1553 is coming soon...

Thursday, December 8, 2011

D3 (...Disrupt, Disable, Destroy...)

SUPPRESSION OF ENEMY AIR DEFENSE
(Disrupt, Disable, Destroy)


The suppression of enemy air defences (SEAD) remains a cornerstone in establishing air superiority over a battle area, though it is somewhat overshadowed by the need to defeat the threat posed by shoulder-launched, infra-red guided surface-to-air missiles (SAMs). 

SEAD operations, together with the related destruction of enemy air defences (DEAD), seek to disrupt, disable and/or destroy hostile, predominantly radar-based air-defence networks to the point were they are unable to respond effectively to the application of air power. 

SEAD functions may be divided into 'soft' and 'hard' kill actions, with the former seeking to attack, disrupt and even control a network's sensors, communications links and decision-making/command tools. In the hard kill sphere, the intention is to either disable or destroy key nodes within a network under attack with a heavy emphasis on sensor systems such as radars. 

In the 'hard' kill arena, the traditional weapon of choice against air-defence radars (still central to successful wide-area defence against air attack) has been the anti-radiation missile.




SEAD VIDEO
Part 1: http://adf.ly/46rPl
Part 2: http://adf.ly/46rSp

Design Specifications of Harrier-II


General characteristics
·         Crew: 1 pilot
·         Length: 46 ft 4 in (14.12 m)
·         Wingspan: 30 ft 4 in (9.25 m)
·         Height: 11 ft 8 in (3.55 m)
·         Wing area: 243.4 ft² (22.61 m²)
·         Airfoil: supercritical airfoil
·         Empty weight: 13,968 lb (6,340 kg)
·         Loaded weight: 22,950 lb (10,410 kg)
·         Max takeoff weight:
o    Rolling: 31,000 lb (14,100 kg)
o    Vertical: 20,755 lb (9,415 kg)
·         Powerplant: 1 × Rolls-Royce F402-RR-408 (Mk 107) vectored-thrust turbofan, 23,500 lbf (105 kN)
·         Performance
·         Maximum speed: Mach 1.0 (585 knots, 673 mph, 1,083 km/h)
·         Range: 1,200 nmi (1,400 mi, 2,200 km)
·         Combat radius: 300 nmi (350 mi, 556 km)
·         Ferry range: 1,800 nmi (2,100 mi, 3,300 km)
·         Rate of climb: 14,700 ft/min (4,485 m/min)
·         Wing loading: 94.29 lb/ft² (460.4 kg/m²)
·         Armament
·         Guns: 1× General Dynamics GAU-12 Equalizer 25 mm (0.984 in) 5-barreled gatling cannon mounted under-fuselage in the left pod, with 300 rounds of ammunition in the right pod
·         Hardpoints: 6× under-wing pylon stations holding up to 13,200 lb (5,988 kg) of payload:
·         Rockets:
o    4× LAU-5003 rocket pods (each with 19× CRV7 70 mm rockets)
·         Missiles:
§  4× AIM-9 Sidewinder or similar-sized infrared-guided missiles
§  6× AIM-120 AMRAAM (on radar equipped AV-8B Plus variants)
§  6× AGM-65 Maverickor
§  2× AGM-84 Harpoonor
§  2× AGM-88 HARM
·         Bombs:
o    CBU-100 cluster bombs (CBUs)
o    Mark 80 series of unguided bombs (including 3 kg and 14 kg practice bombs)
o    Paveway series of laser-guided bombs (LGBs)
·         Others:
o    up to 4× 300/330/370 US Gallon drop tanks (pylon stations No. 2, 3, 4 & 5 are wet plumbed)
o    Intrepid Tiger II electronic jammer.[120]
·         Avionics
·         Raytheon APG-65 radar
·         AN/AAQ-28V LITENING targeting pod (on radar-equipped AV-8B Plus variants)
o     An upgrade program is currently fitting airframes with wiring and software to employ MIL-STD-1760 bus-based smart weapons, such as Joint Direct Attack Munitions.
 Power and Lift
·         A 23,500-pound thrust Rolls-Royce Pegasus 11-61 (F402-RR-408) engine
·         Four rotating nozzles that provide its direct-lift capability, enabling the aircraft to hover
More Weapon Systems
·         APG-65 radar system
·         A 25mm rapid-fire Gatling gun
·         Air-to-air weapon systems:
·         Heat-seeking Sidewinder missiles
·         AIM-120 advanced medium range air-to-air missile (AMRAAM), which is a beyond-visual-range missile
·         Air-to-surface weapon systems:
·         Digital targeting data link
·         Global positioning system
·         Litening II Targeting Pod system
·         Next-generation, precision-guided munitions, including the joint direct attack munition (JDAM)



My chosen plane for ASD Report

AV-8B HARRIER-II PLUS
HARRIER-II PLUS is an advanced version, which has Night Attack variant, with the addition of an APG-65 radar, FLIR.
The McDonnell Douglas AV-8B Harrier II is a second-generation vertical/short takeoff and landing (V/STOL)ground-attack aircraft. The AV-8B is primarily used for light attack or multi-role missions, and is typically operated from small aircraft carriers, large amphibious assault ships and simple forward operating bases. The AV-8B Harrier is a single-seat, light attack aircraft that provides offensive air support to the Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF). By virtue of its Vertical/Short Take-Off or Landing (V/STOL) capability, the AV-8B can operate from a variety of amphibious ships, rapidly constructed expeditionary airfields, forward sites (e.g., roads), and damaged conventional airfields. This makes the aircraft particularly well-suited for providing dedicated close air support.
The AV-8B Harrier II Plus is a multi-mission, short-takeoff vertical landing (STOVL) tactical strike aircraft. Because of its short-to-vertical takeoff and landing characteristics, it possesses basing flexibility that is unmatched by other fixed-wing aircraft. Furthermore, it supports a broad selection of air-to-air and air-to-surface weapon systems and third-generation technologies that address diverse tactical scenarios.

Avionics Engineering

B.E Avionics Engineering?

BE degree programme in Avionics Engineering is designed with an objective to instill in students the knowledge and perspective appropriate both for a professional career and for the pursuit of advanced degrees. Such principles and practices include rigorous quantitative reasoning and robust engineering design. This mission is accomplished by ensuring that students achieve both depth and breadth of knowledge in their studies and by maintaining a high degree of flexibility in the curriculum.

This program also seeks to provide a good preparation for life, including an ability to communicate in written and oral forms, and a desire to continue learning throughout life. Subjects offered in PAF-KIET Avionics Engineering curriculum are divided in five major groups namely Electrical Machines, Flight Control Systems, Radar, Guidance, Navigation & Control and Avionics Systems Design.

Students join the department on completion of three years of electronics study, which is common for all students. Many subjects related to engineering are also taught to the students during their stay in the department. A total of 140.5 Credit hours of academic work are completed that includes an independent project in the final semester.

What is Avionics?

Avionics is a term used to describe all of the electronic systems used on aircraft, artificial satellites and spacecraft.
Avionic systems include communicationsnavigation, the display and management of multiple systems and the hundreds of systems that are fitted to aircraft to meet individual roles. These can be as simple as a searchlight for a police helicopter or as complicated as the tactical system for an Airborne Early Warning platform.